
It seems Monsanto’s toxic chemical glyphosate has now found its way into wine. It isn’t surprising, however, seeing as how grapes are pesticide and herbicide-laden.
Glyphosate has been showing up in foods both directly sprayed, and even foods that haven’t been sprayed, such as organic produce. It is the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, and has been used since 1974.
Recent research has suggested that glyphosate will “likely remain the most widely applied [herbicide] worldwide for years to come, and interest will grow in quantifying ecological and human health impacts.” The study showed that in 2014, farmers sprayed enough glyphosate to apply 0.8 pounds of the chemical to every acre of cultivated cropland in the U.S.
100 Percent of Wine Tested Contained Glyphosate
A supporter of Moms Across America went ahead and sent 10 different wine samples, from large and small vineyards, to Microbe Infotech Lab of St. Louis. What they found was shocking. The active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller, glyphosate, tested positive in both conventional, and organic wines (although organic wines had significantly lower levels).
The test results showed that all 10 samples tested positive for glyphosate.
- The highest level detected: 18.74 ppb in a 2013 Cabernet Sauvignon from a conventional vineyard—28 times higher than other samples.
- The lowest: 0.659 ppb in a 2013 Syrah from a biodynamic organic vineyard that had reportedly never been sprayed.
All wines were sourced from California’s North Coast region (including Napa, Sonoma, and Mendocino counties) and tested between 2015–2016.
The wine brands tested included:
- Gallo
- Beringer
- Mondavi
- Barefoot
- Sutter Home
New Study Reveals Similar Results
This isn’t the only study that has revealed toxic weedkiller in alcoholic beverages. A new study released in March of 2019 confirmed that beer and wine are not safe from the cancer-causing weedkiller.
To explore how much Roundup the average person drinks, the U.S. PIRG tested 15 beers and 5 wines for glyphosate, the weedkiller’s active ingredient. Of the 20 samples tested, all but ONE contained glyphosate, and 3 out of 4 organic beers and wines contained glyphosate (likely caused by pesticide drift, shared equipment, or water contamination).
Brands with the highest concentration of glyphosate were as follows:
Top wines with glyphosate detected:
- Sutter Home Merlot: 51.4 ppb
- Beringer Founders Estates Moscato: 42.6 ppb
- Barefoot Cabernet Sauvignon: 36.3 ppb
Top beers with glyphosate:
- Tsingtao Beer: 49.7 ppb
- Coors Light: 31.1 ppb
- Miller Lite: 29.8 ppb
- Budweiser: 27 ppb
- Corona Extra: 25.1 ppb
- Heineken: 20.9 ppb
- Guinness Draught: 20.3 ppb
Other brands also came up positive for glyphosate, but at lower levels.
Health Concerns Over Glyphosate
Exposure to glyphosate at doses nearing the 0.100 ppb mark completely destroy beneficial gut bacteria, and exposures higher than that can cause breast cancer, destroy nerve cells, and damage the kidneys and liver. It can also cause miscarriages, as it destroys the placenta in pregnant and fertile women.
Since 1974, America has used over 1.8 million tons of glyphosate, with over 9.4 million tons having been sprayed on crops worldwide.
The World Health Organization finally declared that glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic to humans” in their International Agency for Research on Cancer in March 2015. That isn’t to say that Monsanto necessarily agrees, however, as they have been actively trying to fight this claim since then.
A simple Google Scholar search on glyphosate reveals its effects on health:
- stimulates the growth of human breast cancer cells
- chronic inflammation
- leaky gut
- endocrine-disrupting effects
- cell death
- neurotoxic to brain cells
- reproductive problems
- oxidative damage
- modifies sex hormone balance
- birth defects
- wipes out beneficial gut bacteria
How Does Glyphosate End Up In Wine?
Wine comes from grapes. Grapes are heavily treated with herbicides like Roundup.
Glyphosate enters plants through the soil and roots, moving systemically into the stems, leaves, and fruit. That means it’s embedded in the cells and fluid of the grape itself.
Even if a vineyard switches to organic, glyphosate can linger in soil for 10–20 years, slowly taken up by the vines. It also drifts easily from neighboring fields, contaminates water supplies, and settles in the air and dust.
Other Common Crops Sprayed with Glyphosate
It’s not just wine grapes. A 2015 EPA memo showed glyphosate is sprayed in massive quantities on:
- Almonds
- Corn
- Oranges
- Sorghum
- Soy
- Sugar beets
- Sunflowers
- Wheat
- Cotton
Each of these crops receives over a million pounds of glyphosate annually in the U.S.
Cotton (used in clothing and hygiene products) gets a whopping 18.4 million pounds each year. So glyphosate isn’t just in your wine—it’s in your crackers, your tampons, and your t-shirt.
It’s Not Just Glyphosate We Should Worry About
Glyphosate is harmful, yes. But the co-formulants in Roundup, additives used to boost absorption, may be even more toxic.
These so-called “inert ingredients” are usually kept confidential, but studies show they:
- Act as endocrine disruptors
- Are 1,000x more toxic than glyphosate alone
- Accumulate in body tissues
- Interfere with hormone function at ultra-low levels
According to a study published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health:
“Co-formulants, generally classified as inert and kept confidential, act as endocrine-disrupting chemicals at levels hundreds of times lower than the declared active ingredient.”
Which means: even low-level Roundup exposure could be messing with your hormones, without you ever knowing it.
New Danger: Diquat, Glyphosate’s Toxic Replacement?
As pressure mounts to ban glyphosate, the industry is turning to new chemicals. One of the most common is diquat, an herbicide already banned in the EU and UK, but still widely used in North America.
Unfortunately, diquat may be even worse.
A 2025 study published in Frontiers in Pharmacology found diquat:
- Destroys gut lining proteins (ZO-1 and occludin)
- Kills beneficial gut microbes
- Causes systemic inflammation
- Leads to multi-organ damage, including the liver, kidneys, and lungs
The study concluded that diquat exposure may be more dangerous than glyphosate, especially over time. It’s already being used in U.S. vineyards.
Some Good News: Napa Green Bans Glyphosate
In response to mounting concerns, the Napa Green certification program recently announced a full glyphosate ban across its vineyards by January 2026. Synthetic herbicides will be banned entirely by January 2028.
Napa Green members are shifting toward:
- Mechanical weed removal
- Livestock grazing
- Cover cropping
- Biological pest control
It’s a huge step in the right direction. But until more vineyards follow suit, chemical residue will remain a serious risk.
What You Can Do to Protect Yourself
While we can’t eliminate glyphosate from the food chain overnight, we can make smarter choices:
1. Choose Organic Wine
It’s not glyphosate-free, but it’s better. Organic vineyards aren’t allowed to use Roundup, so any contamination is likely from drift, not direct application.
2. Look for Napa Green Certification
Napa Green-certified wines will soon be 100% glyphosate- and herbicide-free. This is one of the strictest programs in the U.S.
3. Ask Questions
Reach out to vineyards. Ask how they manage weeds and pests. Many small producers are happy to share their methods and proud to offer chemical-free wine.
4. Support Local or Biodynamic Wines
Smaller vineyards often rely on traditional, low-impact growing methods. Look for biodynamic certification (like Demeter), which goes beyond organic.
5. Push for Transparency
Support policies that require herbicide testing and labeling. We deserve to know what’s in our food and drink.
Table: Snapshot Summary at a Glance
| Topic | What’s New (2024–25) |
|---|---|
| Glyphosate in wine | Still present, even in sustainable vineyards, due to drift and soil legacy. |
| Regulatory & certification | Napa Green ban on synthetic herbicides by 2026–28. |
| Diquat dangers | 200× more toxic than glyphosate, long-term organ/gut damage, possible neurotoxicity |
| Health Risks | Gut barrier breakdown, endocrine disruption, cancer, neurodegeneration with chronic low-dose exposure |
| Consumer steps | Opt for organic or Napa Green; support chemical-free weed control; speak up with labels and messages |
Final Thoughts
Glyphosate has been found in every California wine tested, conventional and organic alike. And while some vineyards are moving toward safer methods, many still rely on chemical herbicides that contaminate the soil, the grapes, and ultimately, the wine.
The bigger picture? These toxins aren’t just in wine, they’re in our food, water, clothing, and homes. And now, with glyphosate being phased out, we’re facing new chemicals like diquat that may be even worse.
But knowledge is power. The more we know, the better we can choose. Support vineyards that care. Buy consciously. Spread the word. Because when enough of us raise our voices, and our glasses, we can demand change.








Carly, why not include relevant info about how much glyphosate has been determined to be an acceptable daily intake?
“To evaluate risk the amount of residue detected has to be compared with the acceptable daily intake (ADI) as determined by regulatory agencies around the world. The ADI is based on animal studies, human epidemiological evidence and knowledge of how glyphosate is metabolized. As a general rule, a hundred fold safety factor is built into the ADI based on the maximum amount that causes no observed adverse effect in animals. The consensus is that an ADI of around 0.5 mg intake per kg body weight is supported by the available data. In other words, a 70 kg person can take in 35 mg glyphosate a day without the chemical causing any problem. In the wines tested, the maximum amount detected was 18 ppb, or 0.018 mg per Liter. This means that to approach the ADI someone would have to consume 35/0.018 or 1944 Liters! Furthermore, the 18 ppb was found in only one sample, all the others had at least 28 times less glyphosate. Of course, there are arguments that the ADI is not a reliable benchmark for risk because it does not emerge from studies on humans who have been exposed to known amounts of glyphosate for decades. The fact is that such studies cannot be carried out ethically or logistically. Indeed the ADI is a guess, but an educated one. Even if it were off by a factor of a thousand, which is most unlikely, it would still mean that one could consume 1.9 Liters of that single sample of wine with the 18 ppb residue every day without a worry. And let’s keep in mind that alcohol is a known carcinogen, so it is actually of greater concern than the trace residues of glyphosate in wine.”
In summary, based on science’s best guess, you would need to drink 1,944 liters of wine a day to reach the acceptable daily intake.”
So unless your readers are drinking more than about 2,000 liters per day of the sample tested at 18 PPB they are safe. And they would need to drink more than 56,000 liters of the other samples to reach the ADI.
https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/you-asked/should-we-worry-about-glyphosate-residues-wine?fbclid=IwAR3lfceWMiS2Dc1JQ0nfdgeLVILn0GBPI-_70sy4oN2rGg2i2P_XPBhCa9U
If you’re new to my blog, please read my other articles about glyphosate. This article is a bit older, so I didn’t touch much on that aspect (perhaps I should update), but everyone will have their point of view on what the “safe limit” is. Personally, I believe NO limit is safe, regardless of what the FDA says (the FDA also said DDT was safe at one point – case in point, it’s no longer safe or legal). Glyphosate is largely protected by Monsanto, with countless of studies funded by them and other buddies of theirs to prove their product is safe (when it is indeed not). When a herbicide is labelled as a probable carcinogen by the WHO, I don’t believe ANY level is safe. Again, this is just my opinion.
The study you cite tested 10 samples in California. There are over 3,000 wineries in the state. While the title you chose for this article is technically correct, 100% of the wines tested contained glyphosate, it is misleading in that less than .2% of all wineries were tested.
Also if you are so concerned about carcinogens, why not include the fact that 3.5% of all cancer deaths are attributed to alcohol?
This is weak journalism at best.
Hey Devin – because the title of the article is referencing the study, it is accurate. 100% of California wines tested. Meaning, all the wine samples they tested (from California) turned up positive. Glyphosate is a much worse carcinogen than alcohol, and not just that. It targets your nervous system, and also targets the gut (leading to weakened immune systems and worse nutrient absorption from foods).
I appreciate the article, but would like to know which wineries to avoid
I mention them in the article! Under “wine brands tested.” They didn’t disclose all brands, though.
I think anyone who wants people to believe that there are minimum acceptable levels of toxic chemicals (applied to any type of agriculture) inferring or outright saying is ok to be ingested on a daily basis must be “trolling”, works for, or is a lobbyist of sorts for these corporations.
Yes. There are no acceptable limits of glyphosate.
And I totally agree wit your opinion. 0 ppm is that only acceptable level. Monsanto and Con-Agra are poisoning and putting toxic chemicals into everything we eat, with the help of the FDA and USDA. This has to stop. Many European and Asian countries have outlawed Genetically Modified Foods. Almost all Commercially grown food lacks the vitamins, minerals and other nutrients that the human body needs due to the soils being depleted and sprayed with toxic pesticides etc. This has got to stop.
No level of glyphosate is acceptable as far as I’m concerned.
Devin you’re arguing for the sake of arguing!
Aka a troll. If you think these levels of a known carcinogenic are ok to consumer then I say “Cheers to you! “. Drink up!
I just want to say that i appreciate your work on educating the public on the dangers of what Monsanto is doing to our food! It is so important to let people know. High five! Please don’t give up the good fight. May you be divinely protected and blessed beyond belief.
Thanks Christianna! 🙂
The article is inferring that the Vines are sprayed with Round Up – only GM crops can be sprayed – Round Up is a broad spectrum herbicide which will kill or make the plant sprayed very sick.
In grapes it would be the root zones sprayed to kill competing weeds.
Using Round Up in this situation is risky – if you get drift onto the vine or run off which can be taken up by the roots – you’ll kill the plants you are making a living from.
There are many specific herbicides more suitable than Round Up for this task.
Also consider the Fungicides and pesticides being used – which are usually sprayed to the point of Run Off – so you have them going into the soil as well.
Unfortunately, this is not true. 1,500,000 pounds of glyphosate is sprayed on grapes every year (and likely increasing). Taken directly from the EPA website: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-pJR4cGo9ckb3k4UDczbVdiT1E/view.
Thanks for the info
10!!! I repeat ONLY 10 samples were tested out of millions of bottles of wines produced in California
This is true – I wonder what the results would be if they were all tested…considering grapes are highly sprayed with glyphosate (over 1,500,000 pounds a year: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B-pJR4cGo9ckb3k4UDczbVdiT1E/view).