It seems Monsanto’s toxic chemical glyphosate has now found its way into wine. It isn’t surprising, however, seeing as how grapes are pesticide and herbicide-laden.
Glyphosate has been showing up in foods both directly sprayed, and even foods that haven’t been sprayed, such as organic produce. It is the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup herbicide, and has been used since 1974.
Recent research has suggested that glyphosate will “likely remain the most widely applied [herbicide] worldwide for years to come, and interest will grow in quantifying ecological and human health impacts.” The study showed that in 2014, farmers sprayed enough glyphosate to apply 0.8 pounds of the chemical to every acre of cultivated cropland in the U.S.
100 Percent of Wine Tested Contained Glyphosate
A supporter of Moms Across America went ahead and sent 10 different wine samples, from large and small vineyards, to Microbe Infotech Lab of St. Louis. What they found was shocking. The active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller, glyphosate, tested positive in both conventional, and organic wines (although organic wines had significantly lower levels).
The test results showed that all 10 samples tested positive for glyphosate. The highest level detected was 18.74 parts per billion (ppb), which was found in a 2013 Cabernet Sauvignon from a conventional vineyard. This is 28 times higher than all other samples tested.
The lowest level detected was 0.659 ppb, which was found in a 2013 Syrah, a biodynamic organic vineyard, which, according to the owner, has never been sprayed.
All wines were from the North Coast region of California, the premium wine growing region of California and includes wines from Napa, Sonoma and Mendocino counties. The wines were sent in Sept of 2015 and February of 2016 in two separate groups.
The wine brands tested included:
– Gallo
– Beringer
– Mondavi
– Barefoot
– Sutter Home
So essentially, stay away from all wines made from California vineyards if not organic.
New Study Reveals Similar Results
This isn’t the only study that has revealed toxic weedkiller in alcoholic beverages. A new study released in March of 2019 confirmed that beer and wine are not safe from the cancer-causing weedkiller.
To explore how much Roundup the average person drinks, the U.S. PIRG tested 15 beers and 5 wines for glyphosate, the weedkiller’s active ingredient. Of the 20 samples tested, all but ONE contained glyphosate, and 3 out of 4 organic beers and wines contained glyphosate.
Brands with the highest concentration of glyphosate were as follows:
Wine
1. Sutter Home Merlot: 51.4 ppb
2. Beringer Founders Estates Moscato: 42.6 ppb
3. Barefoot Cabernet Sauvignon: 36.3 ppb
Beer
1. Tsingtao Beer: 49.7 ppb
2. Coors Light: 31.1 ppb
3. Miller Lite: 29.8 ppb
4. Budweiser: 27 ppb
5. Corona Extra: 25.1 ppb
6. Heineken: 20.9 ppb
7. Guinness Draught: 20.3 ppb
Other brands also came up positive for glyphosate, but at lower levels.
Health Concerns Over Glyphosate
Exposure to glyphosate at doses nearing the 0.100 ppb mark completely destroy beneficial gut bacteria, and exposures higher than that can cause breast cancer, destroy nerve cells, and damage the kidneys and liver. It can also cause miscarriages, as it destroys the placenta in pregnant and fertile women.
Since 1974, America has used over 1.8 million tons of glyphosate, with over 9.4 million tons having been sprayed on crops worldwide.
The World Health Organization finally declared that glyphosate is “probably carcinogenic to humans” in their International Agency for Research on Cancer in March 2015. That isn’t to say that Monsanto necessarily agrees, however, as they have been actively trying to fight this claim since then.
A simple Google Scholar search on glyphosate reveals its effects on health:
– stimulates the growth of human breast cancer cells
– chronic inflammation
– leaky gut
– endocrine-disrupting effects
– cell death
– neurotoxic to brain cells
– reproductive problems
– oxidative damage
– modifies sex hormone balance
– birth defects
– wipes out beneficial gut bacteria
How Does Glyphosate End Up In Wine?
As we all know, wine is made from grapes, and these grape plants are sprayed by Roundup. Roundup is used on every crop grown conventionally around the world. Contaminated soil can also retain these chemicals for over 20 years thereafter.
Back to the grape plants. Glyphosate (the active ingredient in Roundup) enters the plant through its roots. It is then taken up into the plant and quite literally embedded in the DNA and cell-fluid of the grape. Sounds tasty, right?
Vineyards aren’t the only crop susceptible to Roundup spray.
An EPA memo from October 2015 revealed a variety of popular food crops sprayed with Roundup. Even more shocking, is that when you compare this list, to the previous data from 2011, it shows that glyphosate use for popular food crops has continued to grow at an alarming rate.
Things like almonds, corn, grapes, oranges, sorghum, soy, sugar beets, sunflowers and wheat recieve well over one million pounds of glyphosate annually.
Cotton, another highly-sprayed crop, also receives around 18,400,000 pounds of glyphosate annually. So it’s not just in the foods or drinks you consume, but also on the clothes you wear.
Not Just Glyphosate?
Glyphosate is dangerous, but it is also important to be aware of other co-formulants present in glyphosate-based herbicides, which have been shown to be hormones disruptors and are 1000x more toxic than glyphosate alone.
According to a study by the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health:
Up to now, the endocrine-disrupting effects of pesticides have been studied mostly based on tests on their declared active ingredient. Here we report for the first time that, below their toxicity thresholds, the co-formulants, generally classified as inerts and kept confidential, act as endocrine-disrupting chemicals at levels up to several hundred times below the level at which the declared active ingredient demonstrates the same activity. Glyphosate is never used alone, but always with its co-formulants. Thus the physiological effects of co-formulants should be more thoroughly tested and declared. We also recommend that the calculation of the ADI for pesticides should be based on toxicity tests of the commercial formulations rather than solely the declared active ingredient.”
It is important to understand that glyphosate is toxic, no matter what the companies (who directly support or work for Monsanto) have to say. It kills the crops it’s sprayed on, and so crops are genetically engineered to be able to survive exposure to the chemical. We should NOT be eating these crops!
Not Just Wine!
Other alcoholic drinks, like beer, have also been found to contain the nasty chemical glyphosate. A report from Germany showed that 14 beers tested positive for glyphosate.
Glyphosate is also found in pretty much all conventional foods grown worldwide, so if you’re not too keen on drinking conventional wine or beer, you might also consider switching eating habits from conventionally grown food items to organic, local or home-grown.
Wally says
Is it possible for a person to actually drink the required “1944 liters per day”, everyday? That is 500 gallons, most of us have a difficult time drinking our 6 to 8 glasses of water a day.
Quoted Ref: In summary, based on science’s best guess, you would need to drink 1,944 liters of wine a day to reach the acceptable daily intake.”
Carly Fraser says
Of course no one is going to drink that much wine! Do you mean reach the acceptable daily intake of glyphosate? Any level of glyphosate in the body is harmful. That’s the point I am trying to make.
David says
“So essentially, stay away from all wines made from California vineyards if not organic.”
So, you test ten samples of wine, from a state which produces thousands and thousands of wines, and you proclaim that all of them are suspect?? No legitimate medical journal would dream of making such a claim, with such a tiny sampling tested. I’d like to see something a little more comprehensive, before making such a sweeping, all-knowing statement.
Carly Fraser says
100% of California Wines Tested. Hence why I wrote “Tested”, and didn’t just leave it to 100% of California Wines. I am mentioning that all the wines they tested in the study came up positive. Not saying all wine in California is tainted, but seeing as how 1,500,000 pounds of glyphosate is sprayed on grapes annually (taken from the EPA website), I wouldn’t be surprised if all wine had glyphosate in it.
Paul says
I get that glyphosate is something you feel passionately about, but there are myriad other toxic chemicals in wine, including the one that is the reason we drink it in the first place. There’s literally 7 million times more ethyl alcohol in that wine than the worst offending glyphosate-containing wine you cite. Heck, there’s more arsenic in the average bottle of wine than glyphosate.
Carly Fraser says
Just putting this information out there so people are aware. We can all make educated decisions for how we want to live, and what we want to eat.
Pat says
Unsurprisingly, on a different front from a study by EWG released in October 2018.
“A second round of tests commissioned by the Environmental Working Group found the active ingredient in Monsanto’s Roundup weed killer (glyphosate) in every sample of popular oat-based cereal and other oat-based food marketed to children. These test results fly in the face of claims by two companies, Quaker and General Mills, which have said there is no reason for concern. This is because, they say, their products meet the legal standards.
Yet almost all of the samples tested by EWG had residues of glyphosate at levels higher than what EWG scientists consider protective of children’s health with an adequate margin of safety. The EWG findings of a chemical identified as probably carcinogenic by the World Health Organization come on the heels of a major study published in JAMA Internal Medicine…”
“… tests detected glyphosate in all 28 samples of products made with conventionally grown oats. All but two of the 28 samples had levels of glyphosate above EWG’s health benchmark of 160 parts per billion, or ppb.
Products tested by Anresco Laboratories in San Francisco included 10 samples of different types of General Mills’ Cheerios and 18 samples of different Quaker brand products from PepsiCo, including instant oatmeal, breakfast cereal and snack bars. The highest level of glyphosate found by the lab was 2,837 ppb in Quaker Oatmeal Squares breakfast cereal, nearly 18 times higher than EWG’s children’s health benchmark.”
Why am I hijacking this post; I’m taking aim at the anti-vaxxer’s. I’d bet most of them let their children eat Cheerios.
Carly Fraser says
Sorry Pat, I’m not sure why you’re referencing the whole study from EWG? It’s the same one I mention as a source in this article (where the study results came from).
Janette says
Thank you so much for fighting the fight! My hat is off to you!
Barb Herron says
I am all for fighting glyphosate use, but this article was produced after testing a mere ten bottles—that is not a big enough sample to be statistically meaningful, when 17 million gallons of wine are produced each year in California. Plus, the article states all the wines they tested were produced in the northern coastal region—it is extremely misleading to then title the article that 100% of California wine tested has glyphosate. Wine is commercially produced throughout the state. Terrible article using garbage logic/science.
Carly Fraser says
Hey Barb, I’m sorry you feel that way. The title is referencing 100% of California Wines Tested, with emphasis on the tested. 100% of the wines tested did turn up positive. I can see how the title is a little more misleading, however, it is still accurate, as the article is referencing the study to which the article is written about.